Ask the Pastors
Do you have a question about Seeking the Lord, Building Relationships, or Committing to Serve? Is there something you've wondered about, but didn't really want to ask? You can use the form below to ask the question anonymously and we will post the question and answer here. There may be others with the same question!
Submitted Questions & Answers (click on question)
Question: What is the definition of "spirit"?
ANSWER:
Let’s give a very broad definition of the word first and then a more specific understanding. In spiritual terms, a spirit is something that does not have a physical nature. According to John 4:24, “God is Spirit…” While God can take on a physical form, that is not something He is confined to.
Some people think that there are two parts to man and some say there are three. Those who see only two parts say that there is a body and a soul (spirit). Those who see three say there is body, soul and spirit. For the sake of this answer, we will use the view that there are only two parts, due to the fact that spirit and soul are often used interchangeably in Scripture. No matter what the view, the understanding is that there is a part of us that is not physical. It will live on after the death of our physical bodies. There are many references in Scripture that would verify this, including Revelation 6:9, “When He opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the testimony which they held.” This is a clear reference to the soul/spirit living beyond the body.
Question: How do we decide what in the Bible we take literally and what we do not. For example, in the sermon yesterday we are to take everything Jesus says describing Hell as literal yet we ignore other parts of the scripture (like cutting off offending body parts). There seem to be many passages in the Bible that we are allowed to ignore - like the gifts of the spirit, rules for women (not cutting their hair or keeping it covered in church). How can we tell the difference?
ANSWER:
When studying and interpreting the Bible, you should always take the words literally unless it doesn’t make sense to. In the following paragraphs we have tried to provide a complete but succinct answer to your question.
When Hell is described, there is no reason not to take the description of the place literally. For one, Jesus doesn’t just give Hell a passing mention, nor does Scripture. Not only did Jesus talk about it more than Heaven, but we also see Hell being clearly shown in Revelation 20:10, Revelation 20:14-15, Revelation 21:8. In all of these verses, Hell is shown to be a real place where the unrepentant are cast for eternity. Jesus even used the word “Gehenna” as a word for Hell. This was a refuse dump south of Jerusalem where the bodies of dead animals, trash, and even the bodies of criminals were dumped for disposal. The place was constantly consumed with fire to eliminate the garbage in it, so Hell being a real place of real torment seems sure.
What about the passage in Matthew 18:8-9 that Sunday’s sermon referenced? It said that if your hand or foot causes you to sin, that you should cut it off. Or if your eye causes sin, you should pluck it out. Does this indicate that the maimed or deformed are more holy than those who have suffered no loss of body parts? Paul answers this in Romans 6:12-13. He says, “Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts. And do not present your members as instruments of unrighteousness to sin, but present yourselves to God as being alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God.” Instead of mutilation, Paul says we should use our bodies and their members (parts) for good works instead of sin. You can’t do that if you’ve cut off your hand (and honestly cutting off your right hand, would simply lead to sin with your left). Paul and Jesus are not at odds here. Instead, Paul is confirming the real intent of Jesus: Get serious about your sin! I have never seen people dismembered into holiness, but I’ve seen people cut other things out of their lives to avoid sin (Internet, alcohol, etc).
We have made no statements regarding gifts of the Spirit in which they should not be taken literally. Regarding the commands to women in 1 Corinthians 11, the culture dictated that women were to wear veils over the faces as a sign of respect and subjection to their husbands. The women in this particular church were throwing the veils back during prayer, and really making a scene as opposed to praying out of pure motives. While women may not wear head coverings in our church, we teach the same application regarding a wife to be submissive to her husband and respectful in worship (and of course for men to love their wives and also be respectful in worship as well).
Question: I have a question in regards to the sermon today. Does this mean that the idea of Satan is more of a spirit rather than an actual person??? I'm confused....
ANSWER:
Great question thanks for asking. Here is what we can look at regarding angels, Satan and demons. First according to the creation account in Genesis 1-2 there is no mention of God creating the angels. However we read in Psalm 148:2, “Praise Him, all His angels; praise Him, all His hosts!” Psalm 148:5, “Let them praise the name of the Lord, for He commanded and they were created.” Now are the angels, Satan and demons spirits? Well we can see what Hebrews 1:14 says, “Are they not all ministering spirits sent forth to serve, for the sake of those who are to obtain salvation?”
In regards to Satan, we see that Satan was created as angel that worshiped God, yet Satan rebelled against God. Satan is out to stop the work of God. See such passages like Genesis 3, Matthew 4, Revelation 12:9, 20:8. Satan is one that has been defeated and those who trust in Christ are able to claim victory over Satan because of the work of Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 15:57-58).
Question: Hello, Me and my father were just debating Adam being the first man. He says that the OT is just talking about the Jews and that other people existed in Adam's time. Unfortunately, I'm quite ignorant of the OT and he's making some valid objections. Please explain why this is impossible and evidence for Adam being the first man. Thanks and God bless.
ANSWER:
Great discussion, but one that scripture easily remedies. Genesis 2:7 seems pretty clear that Adam was the first man, “Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.” Adam was formed in a way that no other man was, or would ever need to be. He was in fact the first and only man.
1 Corinthians 15:45 goes on to verify this detail when it says, “So also it is written, ‘The first MAN, Adam, BECAME A LIVING SOUL.’ The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.” This is a comparison of Adam and Jesus, but within the point is made that Adam was the first man.
The Genesis 2:7 regarding Adam is not just talking about the Jews because technically, the Jews didn’t exist yet. Not until Abraham in Genesis 12, does God establish the nation of Israel through him. This was well after Adam, Noah, and even the scattering of people across the earth from the tower of Babel in Genesis 11. Some people look at the differences in the races and point to that as proof that there were multiple “Adams” created around the world. This is not verified in Scripture, and the simple fact is that the races are so different because unique genetics were spread around the world and seperated by the language barrier in Genesis 11. Certain genes, varying levels of sunlight, and even diet around the world has caused the variations that we now find amongst the races.
If there are other objections he raised that you would like specific answers on, feel free to follow up with them. Hopefully this will be enough to make your point, which is the biblical point of view.
Page 4 of 4 pages ‹ First < 2 3 4